CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: No.47, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Motahhari Street, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1576613111 (s.a.hosseini69@ut.ac.ir)
Abstract (98 Views)
The analysis ofSubject-Predicate Transposition in simple helliyya propositions structures the proposition “Man is existent” as “This is the existence of man.” Generally, this transposition is articulated by referencing Mulla Sadra’s doctrine of the Primacy of Existence. In this article, I will demonstrate that: Firstly, historical roots—largely stemming from textual interpretative disputes—paved the way for Mulla Sadra to propose this theory. Secondly, in formulating this theory, Mulla Sadra is compelled to adopt numerous foundational principles from Dawani amidst the polemic between Dashtaki and Dawani, including the Law of Attribution and Relation, the Expanded Attribution, the Separation of the (Sphere/Diathesis) of Attribution from the Sphere of Realization of Attribution, the Types of Attributive Correspondence of Predication, and the Derivative Rule arising from the Expanded Attribution. Third, by considering these historical foundations and juxtaposing numerous texts from Mulla Sadra, this study offers a more precise interpretation of this theory.