Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 2, Issue 3 (2022)
J Clin Care Skill 2022, 2(3): 209-221 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2022/04/25 | Accepted: 2022/08/11 | Published: 2022/09/19
Received: 2022/04/25 | Accepted: 2022/08/11 | Published: 2022/09/19
How to cite this article
Ghalbi F. گستردهگرایی در دامنه: در دفاع از سوزا. J Clin Care Skill 2022; 2 (3) :209-221
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-64233-en.html
URL: http://jpt.modares.ac.ir/article-6-64233-en.html
Analytical Philosophy Research Institute, Fundamental Knowledge Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (2623 Views)
Kripke’s modal argument against the descriptive theory of names (descriptivism) is based on the idea that descriptivism cannot explain the intuitions arising from the rigidity of proper names. One answer to the modal argument is widescopism. In this paper, I first introduce the modal argument and widescopism. I, then, explain how Kripke and Soames argue against widescopism. In the next stage, I reconstruct Sosa’s answer to Kripke’s and Soames’s. After that, I turn to Caplan's argument against Sosa's solution. According to Caplan, Sosa's solution leads to the loss of the main and primary intuitions of descriptivism. I try to show that Sosa can defend his solution against Caplan.
Keywords: