Philosophical Thought
eISSN : 0000-0000
10.5
citescore
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years
10.5
impact factor
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
pubmed
CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. 2018-2021) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of these documents in these same four years (e.g. 2018 – 21).
10.5
Embase
Biosis Preview
Volume 6, Issue 2 (2026)
3 2026, 6(2): 125-139 |
Back to browse issues page
Request Type:
History
Received: 2026/01/15 | Accepted: 2026/02/23 | Published: 2026/03/6
Received: 2026/01/15 | Accepted: 2026/02/23 | Published: 2026/03/6
How to cite this article
Mohammad Ghorbanian H, Moeini S. Critique of Paul Horwich's Interpretation of Later Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy; Pure Description and Theoretical Structure Challenge. 3 2026; 6 (2) :125-139
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-85695-en.html
URL: http://jpt.daneshafarand.org/article-6-85695-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract (190 Views)
Late Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy, with its emphasis on the central role of language in generating and resolving philosophical misunderstandings, offers a metaphilosophical approach that moves philosophy away from its traditional theoretical mode and transforms it into an essentially descriptive, therapeutic, and anti-theoretical activity. Paul Horwich, in Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy, proposes an eight-step project in which traditional philosophical problems are identified as pseudo-problems, and Wittgenstein’s therapeutic solution is reinterpreted. The central question is to what extent Horwich’s reinterpretation is consistent with Wittgenstein’s purely descriptive and anti-theoretical spirit. The findings indicate that Horwich is notably successful in emphasizing the role of language, defending anti-theoretical philosophy, and clarifying its therapeutic dimension. However, in presenting the eight-step project as a form of systematization, in claiming that all philosophical problems can be reduced to an a priori/a posteriori conflict as an overgeneralization, in displaying inconsistency in the analysis of the problem of consciousness, and in attributing explanatory power to philosophical theories, he introduces tensions that at times steer his interpretation toward theoretical construction.
Keywords:
| | Full-Text (HTML) (4 Views)
References
1. Bunnin N, Yu J, editors (2004). The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/b.9781405106795.2004.00015.x]
2. Crary A, Read R, editors (2000). The new Wittgenstein. London: Routledge. [Link]
3. Hodjati SMA, Ghorbanian HM, Nabavi L, Golfam A (2014). In defense of Paul Horwich's theory of meaning against critics. Philosophy and Kalam. 47(1):31-46. [Persian] [Link]
4. Horwich P (1999). Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link]
5. Horwich P (2013). Wittgenstein's metaphilosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588879.003.0001]
6. Hutto DD (2003). Wittgenstein and the end of philosophy: Neither theory nor therapy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/9780230503205]
7. Meshkat M (2013). The beginning of philosophy from the viewpoint of later Wittgenstein and Hegel. Wisdom And Philosophy. 9(34):21-62. [Persian] [Link]
8. Mohammad Ghorbanian H (2021). Consideration and critique of Horwich's solution for the liar paradox in terms of the minimalist theory of truth. Philosophia et Theologia: Dialogues in Criticism and Reflection. 26(102):32-61. [Persian] [Link]
9. Mohammad Ghorbanian H, Hojjati A (2010). Paul Horwich: Minimalist theory of truth and scientific realism. Philosophy of Religion Research. 7(1):5-34. [Persian] [Link]
10. Mosmer R (2019). Horwich's criticism of Kripke's account of rule-following. Philosophy of Science. 8(2):105-127. [Persian] [Link]
11. Norman RJ (1976). Hegel's "phenomenology": A philosophical introduction. Eastbourne: Sussex University Press. [Link]
12. Putnam H (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511625398]
13. Wittgenstein L (2006). Blue book. Hoseini M, translator. Tehran: Hermes Press. [Persian] [Link]
14. Wittgenstein L (2009). Philosophical investigations. 4th edition. Anscombe GEM, Hacker PMS, Schulte J, translators. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. (Original work published 1953) [Link]
15. Wittgenstein L (2019). Philosophical investigations. Hoseini M, translator. Tehran: Hermes Press. [Persian] [Link]
16. Wittgenstein L (2021). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Hoseini M, translator. Tehran: Hermes Press. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.2307/j.ctv22d4t7n]