TMU
0.8
Volume 14, Issue 1 (2026)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2026, 14(1): 139-145 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Descriptive & Survey |

Print XML PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Yuda Pratama M, Yustina I, Nurmaini N, Zulkarnain Z, Silaban G, Mutiara E, et al . Selective Mediating Role of Quality of Work Life on Health Worker Performance in Decentralized Systems. Health Educ Health Promot 2026; 14 (1) :139-145
URL: http://hehp.daneshafarand.org/article-4-85678-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of Northern Sumatra, Medan, Indonesia
2- Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Northern Sumatra, Indonesia
3- Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of North Sumatra, Dr. T Mansur Street, No. 9, Padang Square, Medan, Indonesia. Postal Code: 20155 (muchtiyuda@students.usu.ac.id)
Abstract   (191 Views)

Aims: This study analyzed whether quality of work life consistently mediates the relationships between organizational commitment, healthy work environment, motivational climate, career development, and health worker job performance in decentralized primary care systems.
Instrument & Methods: This explanatory quantitative study used validated measures to assess organizational commitment, workplace quality, motivation, career progression, quality of work life, and job performance among 320 primary healthcare workers in the local government of Aceh, Indonesia. Indirect and direct relationships were examined using partial least squares structural equation modeling.
Findings: Quality of work life significantly mediated the effects of motivational climate (β=0.147; t=3.467; p=0.001) and career development (β=0.105; t=2.974; p=0.003) on job performance, but did not mediate the effects of organizational commitment (β=0.01; t=1.106; p=0.269) or healthy work environment (β=0.006; t=0.86; p=0.39). Healthy work environment (β=0.216; t=6.279; p<0.001) and organizational commitment (β=0.423; t=6.569; p<0.001) significantly influenced job performance independently of quality of work life, while motivational climate had a marginal direct effect (β=0.115; t=1.878; p=0.06). The paths from organizational commitment (β=0.035; t=1.227; p=0.22) and healthy work environment (β=0.021; t=0.895; p=0.371) to quality of work life were not significant.
Conclusion: Quality of work life improves health professionals’ performance in decentralized health systems by selectively mediating the effects of motivational climate and career development, while organizational commitment and health environment influence performance through other direct pathways.
 

Keywords: