Volume -
3 , - : 13-17 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Effect of a Health Belief Model Educational Intervention on Promoting Fistula Care Behaviors in Hemodialysis Patients. 3 https://doi.org/10.58209/gmjm.3.1.13
URL: http://daneshafarand.org/article-1-217-en.html
URL: http://daneshafarand.org/article-1-217-en.html
Abstract: (1924 Views)
Aims: Chronic diseases need to be cared for, increasing and improving quality of life. Chronic kidney disease is increasing all over the world and is a public problem for worldwide health, and some hemodialytic patients need an arteriovenous fistula. Self-care with arteriovenous fistula has a long history, and several studies have investigated it, but the health belief model has not been investigated. Seemingly, the HBM can improve it. This study aimed to investigate the effect of educational interventions based on NBM for promoting fistula care behaviors of hemodialysis patients.
Materials & Methods: Seventy hemodialytic patients with arteriovenous fistula were assigned into two groups: control and intervention. The authors designed a questionnaire that included awareness, perceived susceptibility, severity, barriers and benefits, and self-efficacy. The questionnaire was distributed before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and two months after the intervention. Instructional media and individual consultations were used as intervention periods.
Findings: The educational intervention did not have a significant effect on awareness (p>0.05) but increased perceived susceptibility, severity, barriers and benefits, and self-efficacy (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Educational interventions based on the health belief model promote fistula healthcare behaviors among hemodialytic patients.
Materials & Methods: Seventy hemodialytic patients with arteriovenous fistula were assigned into two groups: control and intervention. The authors designed a questionnaire that included awareness, perceived susceptibility, severity, barriers and benefits, and self-efficacy. The questionnaire was distributed before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and two months after the intervention. Instructional media and individual consultations were used as intervention periods.
Findings: The educational intervention did not have a significant effect on awareness (p>0.05) but increased perceived susceptibility, severity, barriers and benefits, and self-efficacy (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Educational interventions based on the health belief model promote fistula healthcare behaviors among hemodialytic patients.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Biotechnology
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |